patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Traffic Circle Monument Damaged Again

For the second time in as many years, a driver has struck the monument at the Piney Orchard Parkway roundabout.

 
0 of 0
The roundabout in Piney Orchard was damaged by an errant driver. Ray Milio
Photos (3)

Photos

Tire tracks on the grass in front of the roundabout monument.
Sidewalk damaged by a vehicle that failed to follow the traffic pattern.
The roundabout in Piney Orchard was damaged by an errant driver.

You may recall that last year, a driver failed to follow the road pattern at the traffic circle on Piney Orchard Parkway and drove right into the monument, damaging it severely.

It appears that such an incident has happened again.

Reader Ray Milio forwarded me these photos of damage at the Piney Orchard roundabout. Once again, it appears that a driver went straight into the circle and damage the monument and sign.

Milio said the incident happened sometime around 1 a.m. Saturday. I'll be following up with the police to get more details on what happened.

Related Topics: Damaged Roundabout, Piney Orchard, and bad driving

Ronald

7:42 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Seems like the traffic calming ideas aren't calming anyone.

Reply

Shane Wolfe

9:30 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Does anyone else think that this sign/monument is a ridiculous waste of space? Does a roundabout really need to be labeled? How about monument to a local civic hero or a fancy flower planter instead? Better yet, how about replacing some of the trees?

Reply

JACK LITTLE

9:57 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

HOW ABOUT SOME HUGE BOLDERS THE SIZE OF A VW.MAYBE THE DRUNKS CAN SEE THAT

Reply

TA

9:57 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

The driver that did the damage should be responsible for the payment to get the monument fixed properly.

Reply

Chris W

10:23 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

All this to avoid having a traffic light!

Seems to be working. Not!

Reply

TC

11:35 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012

How about a tribute to one of Maryland's fallen service members with ties to our community? I like the idea of some boulders or something else that'll stop the drunks from plowing into the center of the circle too.

Reply

Mitch Wightman

12:43 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Gee, we never had that happen with old traffic light. The MDOT people told us at the meetings (where just about everyone was against the trafic circle I might add) that this would save money because it didn't require electricity or maintenance! I wonder how much we've spent on repairing and maintaining this thing since it's been put in.

Reply

Gerri Cappuccio

12:53 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

I think the traffic circles are awful because some people do not know how to drive in them. What exactly is the purpose of a traffic circle. It is another way of taking risks. I hate them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

2:14 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

I love traffic circles. I don't have to wait for a light! I just come to the circle, make sure no ones in the circle and go. Ignorance should not be an excuse for not being able to navigate a simple traffic circle. You take a risk every time you come to a traffic light also. Just because you have a green light doesn't mean you can go through an intersection at posted speed. You have to enter any intersection (or traffic circle) on guard.

Comment_arrow

Dave M

8:28 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Mark, my family and I experienced just that scenario while at the Waugh Chapel Road/Strawberry Lake Way intersection. Our light had turned green and the car in front of us went across to Chapelgate when another car came through the red going towards Rt 3 without even slowing down (had to be only feet away from the other car's bumper). I don't know where the young lady's mind was at when she did it but her male companion had what looked like one of those I can't believe you just did that smiles on his face. She never once slowed down.

For those who think we should do away with round-a-bouts, can we get rid of yield signs and traffic lights as well since people don't seem to know how to deal with those as well?

Helen

12:58 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

I would sure hope that the parties driving and causing this damage picks up the tab. If not you need some new board members and turn these claims over to the associations attorney tonprosecute. Round sboutd are efficient and move traffic faster but the State shouldn't be putting them in without educating all drivers how to navigate through them. Now the State is putting in more expense to paint unnecessary lane markers and poles that only add to the confusion of drivers. Lights need to shine on the monument after dusk so it is more visible. Granted Im rarely in that area at night so if there are lights 'on and around" the monument now, gurss they need brighter ones.

Reply

Carol B

2:08 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

I don't drive in that area after dark, either, but one of the comments above mentions that the roundabout was supposed to save money because "it doesn't require electricity." If that's so--they should at least install some solar-powered spotlights. Changing the configuration of the roundabout so that 18-wheelers can no longer run one onto the bricks when they want to proceed toward Crofton as you want to turn into the Piney Orchard shopping center was useful--that happened to me in broad daylight, one sunny Saturday afternoon--but roundabouts are a European concept that remains a novelty here. Nonetheless: that's a reason for caution, if you don't know how they work--not ploughing through them like a bulldozer. If you want to see accidents waiting to happen, travel periodically over the Wilson Bridge into Virginia: the persistent reconfigurations there are not only mind-boggling, but dangerous, as the flyover in Springfield was when it was being built. People in this area have an obsession with being first--on the road, on the streets, on the trains and Metro--so it is perhaps a little naive to expect them to yield (as they must) to the traffic in a roundabout, or to suppress the urge to beat other cars into the circle. (I very nearly avoided an accident at 5:30 AM last week when a truck coming off 32 onto 175 ignored the yield sign, and tried to cut in ahead of me. I was on 175, so had the right of way--but that didn't seem to faze this driver, either.)

Reply

Ronald

2:50 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

The driver has paid in the past. The issue is that this is a pathetic excuse for traffic calming that needs to go. It was a pathetic decision made, in part, by the POCA Board. The entire circle needs to be re-done so that it is a two way circle instead of a four way lane. Or better yet - a traffic light.

Reply

Megan Arts Evans

4:51 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

If you want to complain about useless traffic calming, let's complain about the "circle" outside of the development that I live in off Strawberry Lake. Nobody coming in out of the developments on either side go around the circle, they just "turn" right and left and thereby are going directly into oncoming traffic. It's ridiculous. I can't tell you how many times I've almost been hit head-on because people don't want to take the extra few seconds to obey the circle. I agree, it's a dumb circle, but it's there so people should pay attention.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

9:58 am on Monday, August 20, 2012

LOL Megan is the circle dumb or are the people who want to save those few extra seconds dumb? I think it the people who are dumb. JMO :-)

Comment_arrow

Dave M

8:40 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Brian, I think I know which circle Meagan is talking about and it is a dumb circle. I used to live over there and I can't for the life of me understand what the developers where thinking when they built it. Other than maybe to slow cars before they get to the school but there is nothing to slow cars on the other side of the school. Then again, it doesn't really slow cars as they just veer a little to the right and go straight through.

david young

5:14 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

This "dumb" traffic circle probably saved a life. The Vehicle went straight through and jumped two curbs which indicates speed was a factor.

Traffic light or not, this idiot would have blown through the intersection and quite possible have hit an oncoming vehicle.

Megan is absolutely right people should pay attention.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ronald

7:20 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

It appears as if she fell asleep at the wheel after a long-hard day. Time for old fashioned 'no-doze'. The circle saved lives this time.

Jamie Huntley

5:22 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

People drive crazy around that circle, its a nice idea but doesn't "calm" traffic.

Reply

Dave

6:18 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Keep in mind that this circle is probably impeding dump truck traffic that would be destined for the landfill off of Patuxent road near Woodwardville - install a big traffic light there and you have removed one more impediment to turning this area into landfill city.

Reply

Mike Brown

6:20 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

I believe there are several areas in the Odenton area that needs fixing when it comes to traffic. One area is Waugh Chapel Road at the intersection with Piney Orchard Parkway. Drivers always run the red light to make the right hand turn to go on Piney Orchard Parkway. This is just one of many. At this particular intersection they have put a "speed trap" up before the circle that tells drivers to slow down. If you hit any where between 25+ it trips the sensor. Thank God the damage was not too extensive this time. I agree that the driver should have to pay for the repairs as it goes to the saying you break it you buy it. POCA should not take 6+ months to get it fixed especially with the minimal damage that was done. My only question is that was the driver this time drunk? I believe the driver from the first accident was drunk and if this person was drunk then I think AAPD needs to do a checkpoint on PO Pkwy for safety.

The other issues with traffic on PO Parkway is speeding and tailgating. I have passed a car accident and then I had someone speed past me going 50+ MPN. That is insane. I have then been tail gated because I was not going fast enough and then been flipped the bird. Really!?!?! I think people need to go back to traffic school!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ronald

7:18 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

I think a big part of the problem is that Piney Orchard only has 2.75 police officers assigned to us. That is the main reason we pay a hugh portion of our dues for
off-duty cops to babysit the POCA Board at their Board Meetings and make a few rounds every so often. Until POCA stands up for our rights to be protected don't hold your breath waiting for people to do the right thing. As far as it taking 6+ months to fix. POCA did do the right thing last time by going out for bids to repair the damage. Depending upon how much it costs this time it may take that long again.

Rhonda Ryan

7:09 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Tim, how about doing an investigative piece on how many accidents there have been since they put in the roundabout, verses when they had the traffic lights there?? Might be eye opening !

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Tim Lemke

7:35 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

We will look into it, but keep in mind that traffic circles aren't necessarily designed to reduce the frequency of accidents, but the severity of them. Officials from State Highway want to avoid the kind of head-on accidents that you might see more frequently at traffic lights.

That said, I don't think anyone is pleased to see people driving directly through circles into brick walls.

Jeff Andrade

7:59 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

Why is this news? Is Patch looking at accidents at every intersection in Odenton and Severn? This circle was put in by the developer and County DPW well over a decade ago, not POCA. POCA's safety committee did work with DPW last year to get several lane delineation and approach improvements at this circle which have resulted in zero car collisions between cars in the circle. Can't do much to stop lone cars not staying on the road late at night. If folks recall bad drivers have also hit the brick signs at West Courts and at the intersection of Waugh Chapel and PO Pkwy -- those aren't circles, so what the problem there?

Reply
Comment_arrow

kingofodenton2

9:42 am on Monday, August 20, 2012

I don't agree with you often Jeff, but in this case I do.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Tim Lemke

12:33 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Jeff, this is news because it's the second time this has happened, and it's a recognizable spot in town. I'm not making any judgement as to whether it's the fault of POCA, the circle, or anything else.

Chris W

8:30 pm on Sunday, August 19, 2012

They hit light poles all the time too.

Wait, come to think of it, they are circular too.

Reply

Marc Riley

6:17 am on Monday, August 20, 2012

Wow...look at all of you adults blaming inanimate objects for human error and crappy driving! I guess I shouldn't be shocked. Traffic circles WORK, if YOU DRIVERS use them correctly. Let's talk about crosswalks...did you know when you approach a crosswalk, if someone is WAITING to enter the crosswalk, you are ALSO supposed to stop for them? Yah...I'm not totally sure it's the law, but it's common courtesy (the main thing we seem to lack around here). I saw an elderly woman patiently waiting in the MIDDLE of a street, within a crosswalk, while car after car just zoomed right past her, nobody stopping to let her cross. I had to ride my bike into the crosswalk and STOP traffic myself, so she could pass, and even then I got evil looks. We're an impatient, inconsiderate set of people, us PO peeps. Not shocked someone was speeding along and hit that big brick structure...and why are y 'all assuming they were drunk, they were probably F'ing with their phone!

Reply
Comment_arrow

MSW

3:36 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Maryland Laws:
These laws, along with explanatory diagrams, can be accessed at the link below: http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/DOT/dir/pedsafety/documents/md_ped_law.pdf

The driver of a vehicle must stop for a pedestrian in a marked or unmarked crosswalk when:

At crosswalks and intersections without signals:
The pedestrian is on the half of the roadway on which the vehicle is traveling.
The pedestrian is approaching within one lane of the half of the roadway on which the vehicle is traveling.(§ 21-502 (a)(2))

At intersections with signals:
When proceeding on a green signal, drivers turning right or left shall yield the right-of-way to pedestrians lawfully within the crosswalk.
When turning right on red after stopping, drivers shall yield the right of way to pedestrians lawfully within the crosswalk.(§ 21-202 (c), (d) & (k))

kingofodenton2

9:40 am on Monday, August 20, 2012

@ Megan If you are talking about the circle in front of River Colony you are not supposed to go around the circle when exiting the community. We were told this by the county when it was first installed.

Reply

kingofodenton2

12:14 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Just rode by the circle. If you look at the scene this accident was not the fault of the circle. It looks like the driver was either drunk or did it on purpose.

Reply

Jeff Andrade

1:02 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

@Tim and others, this accident was thankfully much different. No damage to the brick structure -- just the curb and the landscaping. And the driver left his front bumper with license plate attached as a calling card so POCA can be reimbursed for the damage he or she caused. Hopefully, we can now get away from stories about people hitting inanimate objects with their cars, and get more analysis of all the various ballot initiatives we will all be asked to decide upon 78 days from now.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Tim Lemke

1:12 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

The initial report we have from police is that the curb was struck by a 42-year-old woman who claimed she fell asleep at the wheel after a long work shift. Happened at about 1:02 a.m. Saturday. It's unclear whether she was cited...will find out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MyOpinion

1:54 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

For what it is worth, there is something very shady going on with this. I received an email in the yahoo piney orchard group saying that it was someone's son that had the accident. The individual stated that rain and slick roads were to blame and they were thanking the few people who stopped and offered assistance to her son and passenger. The police are saying it was a 42-year-old woman, but the email stated her son? Also, from the pictures, it does not look like there are any skid marks like the person even tried to slow down. Grant it, if rain/slick there might not be any, but it looks like the person didn't even try to swerve to avoid anything. Just seems pretty weird to me. Thank you Mr. Lemke for continuing to follow this one. Your efforts are very much appreciated in passing valuabe information to our community.

Comment_arrow

Dave

10:57 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Matt, the accident mentioned on the yahoo PO list is in a different location off of Strawberry Lake way near "the Island" pool - I saw the aftermath myself driving home on Friday night. They are not related accidents.

Captain Morgan

1:37 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

I am wholeheartedly opposed to any sort of sobriety checkpoint on the Piney Orchard Parkway. I drive up and down that road drunk very frequently. I generally have no problem navigating the roundabout, save for the occasional wheel on the curb.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen H.

3:02 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

I know for a sad fact that a sobriety checkpoint on PO Pkwy would be very productive at certain rush hour times of the day.

Susan

2:11 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

@Matt that accident happened on Friday night at another location.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MyOpinion

2:13 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Ok, Thank you. Sorry for the confusion.

Mike Brown

2:48 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

@Jeff Andrade: I understand your point about other intersections having car accidents that are not circles. I really believe that we need an increased number of police officers patrolling PO. I plan on bringing this point up to PO to see what the boards' opinion is on that. Also if you are referring to the national election I would agree that is important but I also think community safety in the area should be equally or more important. I have seen so many people break traffic laws that could lead to numerous injuries.

@Captain Morgan....you are putting so many lives at risk when you do that. Maybe you need to stop drinking before you drive. So is the only reason that you object to a sobriety checkpoint is that you drive drunk alot on PO Parkway.

Reply

Jeff Andrade

3:53 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

@Mike please come to the Board meeting tonight. FYI we already pay for more than 1,800 hours of secondary police patrols each year -- more than any other community around here. And those hours are on top of what we regularly get from Western District. In response to several homeowner observations, this year we've dedicated more of those hours to speed enforcement on both Strawberry Lake Way and Piney Orchard Parkway. In this case the accident occurred after 1 am on a Saturday morning and the driver claims she fell asleep, and we don't know if she was speeding or not. The police can't be everywhere 24/7. We still have community property to patrol and protect, need to be looking out for car thieves in parking lots, looking out for vandals and delinquent teenagers hanging out, etc. Residents need to continue to be diligent in not giving thieves opportunities by leaving valuables in cars, reporting all suspicous activity to police immediately when they see it, obeying local speed and parking laws (like not parking in fire lanes at shopping center), and knowing where their kids are and what they are doing. We have one the safest communities in the area but crime prevention is everyone's responsibiity -- not just the police or the Community Association -- if we are going to keep it that way.

Reply

O'Shea

4:39 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

The secondary police coverage that we pay the county handily for is pathetic. More often than not, I see the (not so) undercover secondary patrol vehicle sitting idle in various parts of the community (shopping center parking lot, Dunkin Donuts parking lot...imagine that...POES parking lot) rather than on patrol. I've only seen a radar post on piney orchard parkway maybe 3 times in the 12 years that I've lived here. I've only seen cars pulled over on piney orchard parkway maybe 5 times in 12 years. And I would submit that utilizing the services of the secondary officer to provide executive protection to the HOA board members is probably not a good use of our resources. While he's sitting in the community center babysitting board members or escorting them and their families to the grocery store, crimes are occuring.

Reply

Jeff Andrade

5:16 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

"O'shea" looks like you just became a member today. I am always suspicious of this since the "trolls" like to set up new aliases to comment on the Patch - which is very childish. FYI the officers log each location they visit and time, log their mileage for the shift, and note any specific issues they have found. The officers are only at POCA Board meetings for part of their shifts because individuals, including Scott DiBiasio and Ronald Grossman have disrupted Board meetings in the past. These disruptions have been documented in the meeting minutes when they have had to be called out of order by the meeting chair.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ronald

7:30 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

I'm sure that both Scott and I have different vfersions on what constitutes disrupted Board meetings. Wasn't it you that stopped the meeting I attended so that you, Lou and the off-duty I am paying part of his salary police officer could get in my face and threaten me because you thought I was tape-recording the meeting and
GOD- FORBID there should be a record of the meeting? Why not just conduct business and not worry about who is recording your 'super secret' meetings that you want no record of. your documentation in the minutes are your perverted version of what happened and not the facts. I will have my attorney review the minutes to see if they constitute slander.

Regardless - how about appeasing Tim L. and not putting these legal issuess on the blog so that I don't have to defend myself and others. How about using the Board to confront the county on the lack of police officers we are entitled to - now wouldn't that be a great way to save us all money?

Mike Brown

6:01 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

@Jeff Andrade Unfortunately I am not able to attend the meeting due to previous commitments. I did not mean any disrespect to you or the community by any means. I think I was blowing off a little steam and did not mean to have it come off to anyone in particular. I feel there are several areas that need help. I do understand that they can not be at every spot all the time. I have talked to AAPD (an officer who lives in my community) about some issues. Maybe the safety committee can look at areas of the PO community to identify the areas that need more help. Do you think that the safety committee could possible do this or something similar? I am just curious are the secondary hours provided by AAPD or are they provided by private security?

I totally agree with you on your statement "Residents need to continue to be diligent in not giving thieves opportunities by leaving valuables in cars, reporting all suspicous activity to police immediately when they see it, obeying local speed and parking laws (like not parking in fire lanes at shopping center), and knowing where their kids are and what they are doing."

Like I have stated I am not able to make the meeting tonight due to previous commitments. Is there a time before the September meeting that we could discuss ideas?

Thank you for all the POCA board does for PO.

Reply

Mayor of Piney Orchard

7:09 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

@Mike Brown...As the newly enlisted Mayor of Piney Orchard, I can assure you that all of your concerns are being addressed. Look for many new and exciting things to come in the near future!!

Reply

Chris W

7:48 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Gosh, you Piney Orchard folks are a hoot! I thought I'd seen some disfunctional families, but you guys are a whole different story.

Reply

Jeff Andrade

10:40 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

@Mike. We agreed to put review of the secondary police patrols on the agenda for September 17. I hope you can make that. Thanks to Safety Committee Chairman Aaron Klebanoff's new web-based data system, we have better analytics on the patrol coverages and results for Board members, and now that we've been reviewing the reports for a few months we thought it would be a good time to go over the current staffing and activities with the police supervisor and Safety Committee members.

Reply

Jeff Andrade

10:51 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Mike, sorry I forgot to give you an answer that the secondary patrols are performed by AACoPD officers but paid by POCA under a contract. They use marked and unmarked police vehicle and are in uniform. If you can't make the Sept meeting, drop me a note and I will raise your questions/issues at the meeting.

Reply

Arlene

11:18 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012

I hope they have a camera up so they can catch who the drunk was who plowed into the sign. That persons insurance should pay for the repair.
They should have better street lighting to illuminate the circle. That road is dark. But people drive way to fast going down it. They need those speed bumps all down it for traffic calming. Also if you are to stupid to know how to navigate a traffic circle you should not be behind the wheel of a car.

Reply

Jeff Andrade

1:02 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Arlene, police were on the scene for this one after it happened, and report was filed that include's driver and insurance info. (See newer articles). Driver was not cited by police, and claims to have fallen asleep. The landscaping repairs have already been looked at by the contractor and will be repaired next week. The curb repair is the County's responsibility and that has request has already been submitted. As with previous accident, the driver (or more specifically their insurance carrier) will pay for all of the Association's repair costs, which in this case is limited only to the landscaping damage.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arlene

6:53 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

I hope it is standard practice for the police to do a breath test for alcohol. Just because she claimed to fall asleep does not rule out any alcohol involved.

Leave a comment